I’ve been pondering the role of Goldman Sachs in the transactions that Senator Levin objected to during recent hearings of the Senate Governmental Affairs Subcommittee on Investigations. Did sales personnel for Goldman Sachs, when offering certain securities at a particular price, owe an obligation to the potential buyer to inform that the price might be too high?
Senator Levin seems to think so, but the business folks at Goldman Sachs seem to think not. Levine kept saying, you were offering a “sh*tty” deal. Goldman Sachs personnel responded, buyers are the judge of a deal’s value given the time and place. Senator Levin, please wash your mouth out with soap!
Various senators kept saying during the hearing, you have a fiduciary responsibility. Goldman Sachs personnel kept saying, not at at a market-justified price.
I have to side with Goldman Sachs (and Warren Buffet) on this one. No one expects a car salesman to have a fiduciary responsibility to a customer (best not to be a single female shopping for a car). No one expects a telemarketer to have a fiduciary responsibility to a customer. So why do politicians expect a securities dealer to have a fiduciary responsibility to buyers? I guess it’s because investors are assumed to be too stupid to look out for themselves.